Opinion: Unethical behavior threatens public trust in Santa Clara

American democracy is at a breaking level, and it’s taking place in any respect ranges of presidency, not simply in our nation’s capital. Many individuals blame political polarization. However the root of the issue is the decline in moral conduct of our civic leaders. When public figures cross moral strains, public belief suffers. Cross the road sufficient instances, the road disappears eternally. Belief is destroyed. With out public belief, democracy dies.

As a skilled ethicist, I labored with the Metropolis of Santa Clara from 1998 to 2015 to develop a sensible code of ethics and award-winning coaching applications for its political campaigns and authorities resolution making. As we speak within the metropolis, I see essentially the most egregious collapse of ethics of any establishment I’ve labored with in three many years.

The decline began in 2010 when the San Francisco 49ers received a marketing campaign to construct a brand new stadium and began their dominance of Santa Clara politics. They’ve been shaping the politics of town ever since. The workforce’s affect has spilled over into metropolis authorities and impacted the moral conduct of its public officers.

In 2020, 49ers CEO Jed York spent almost $3 million to elect a Metropolis Council majority by way of an unbiased expenditure for Anthony Becker, Suds Jain and Kevin Park.  This occurred in a metropolis of roughly 127,000 individuals the place candidates settle for a voluntary expenditure cap of $10,000.

The unbiased expenditure was authorized. The impression was damaging. Within the final two years, a 49er-friendly Metropolis Council majority authorized each main workforce request, ceaselessly over the objection of Mayor Lisa Gillmor, Councilwoman Kathy Watanabe, skilled metropolis workers and residents. Extra considerably, many choices have been made with out regard to conflicts of curiosity, a requirement of moral resolution making. After the council majority fired town supervisor and metropolis lawyer on the urging of the workforce, there was no actually unbiased analysis of workforce proposals and, subsequently, no approach to construct public belief.

Probably the most dramatic instance of Santa Clara’s decline occurred final month when the Metropolis Council majority accepted a authorized settlement supply in a closed-door assembly after rejecting the quite a few requests for a public dialogue and for an unbiased monetary evaluation. Moral leaders would have embraced the alternatives, not shut them down.

Equally egregious was the choice of Councilmembers Raj Chahal and Karen Hardy to take part within the resolution. Chahal was absent for the ultimate settlement vote, however he was concerned within the preliminary deliberations. Each councilmembers are presently below investigation by a state company for allegedly accepting items from the 49ers. But, they might not recuse themselves from voting on the workforce’s settlement supply regardless of quite a few requests. Moral leaders would have achieved so to keep away from the looks of impropriety.

Inexplicably, the Metropolis Council majority didn't even hassle to report, defend or clarify their motion to the general public after the closed-session vote, as is customary. Whatever the difficulty or end result, moral leaders should be clear about their selections in the event that they need to maintain public belief.

The biggest native authorities scandal in California historical past occurred within the Metropolis of Bell, close to Los Angeles simply over a decade in the past. Bell’s leaders deserted their ethics code and their obligation to work for the general public curiosity quite than their very own. They ignored the necessity for transparency and avoiding conflicts of curiosity. Small transgressions led to bigger ones and finally to main political corruption.

Whereas the circumstances right this moment in Santa Clara are considerably completely different than the Bell scandal, I see the identical kind of unethical conduct that erodes public belief and will function a significant warning signal. That’s why it’s essential for all of us to name out unethical conduct after we see it. Step one to fixing an issue is acknowledging it exists. From what I’ve witnessed in Santa Clara, I don’t imagine the Metropolis Council majority has an understanding of ethics or a priority for public belief. It could be disastrous and unhappy if Santa Clara turned the Bell of Northern California.

Tom Shanks is a former government director of Santa Clara College’s Markkula Middle for Utilized Ethics. He just lately based Ethics for America, a web site and publication about ethics and public belief.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post