Submit your letter to the editor by way of this way. Learn extra Letters to the Editor.
Governor ought to honor
voters on demise penalty
I learn not too long ago of how Gov. Gavin Newsom will get his blood boiling when he thinks of our justice system and the demise penalty (“Newsom strikes to dismantle demise row,” Web page A1, Feb. 1). Now he's trying to demolish demise row.
He, who has skilled privilege since start, finds the system reprehensible and has vowed to not permit any executions whereas he's governor, no matter the truth that California voters have twice up to now decade affirmed the will for the demise penalty. His job is to respect and reply to the need of the folks.
I feel maybe he would possibly rethink his stance had been he to evaluate a small sampling of the instances that put a few of the demise row inhabitants there. Have a look at the consideration they gave their victims.
Our system of justice is way from good, however it's nonetheless miles forward of no matter is in second place. Respect it.
George Vien
Pleasanton
Does state have will
to resolve homelessness?
The definition of homeless is lack of a everlasting residence.
“Housing First” is predicated on the idea that a homeless particular person’s or household’s first and first want is to acquire secure housing, and that different points which will have an effect on the family can and ought to be addressed as soon as housing is obtained.
In response to most credible sources, the homeless inhabitants in California is about 160,000. The common hire for an condominium in California is $1,566 per 30 days
If all unhoused people rented an condominium, the fee can be about $3 billion yearly, about 1% of California’s $286.4 billion finances.
Right here on the earth’s fifth-largest economic system, we may get rid of homelessness utilizing 1% of the state finances. I feel most individuals would help this, however does the Legislature have the political will to make it occur?
Tom Butt
Mayor, Metropolis of Richmond
Newsom caught between
pursuits in photo voltaic debate
Re. “Photo voltaic rooftop panel debate locations Newsom in sizzling seat,” Web page A7, Feb. 1:
In terms of protecting impartial rooftop photo voltaic alive in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom is between a rock and a tough place.
The rock is the numerous Californians who referred to as in to the final California Pubic Utility Fee assembly to lodge their considerations in opposition to their new Internet Power Metering (NEM) proposal, mainly a photo voltaic tax that can get rid of any return on funding incentives for owners to modify to photo voltaic. The vast majority of callers had been the workers of photo voltaic installer corporations that can most likely lose their jobs on account of NEM modifications.
The “onerous place” is PG&E and their electrical union, each of that are giant supporters of Newsom, and promote these NEM modifications. Rooftop photo voltaic is the important thing to scrub vitality transition. We will’t try this if we permit ruthless companies to set our local weather coverage.
Rene Clever
Fremont
Common well being care
failure is a victory
Glad to listen to that Assemblyman Ash Kalra’s common well being care plan didn't move and depart us with an infinite invoice on our backs. Each hard-working American citizen can be footing that invoice.
The price of this well being program would improve 12 months after 12 months. It might additionally improve the inhabitants getting into the state of California no matter their standing to be coated freed from cost.
Our state is already expensive. To help well being look after all would solely carry larger prices throughout the board. We have already got applications in place; perhaps they should be upgraded however not a free for all.
Ann Fagliano
Castro Valley