Editorial: San Jose should retain ban on billboards

A billboard prompting the use of face masks sits atop a store on North White Road in San Jose in 2020. (Randy Vazquez/ Bay Area News Group)

A billboard prompting using face masks sits atop a retailer on North White Street in San Jose in 2020. (Randy Vazquez/ Bay Space Information Group)

Billboards are eyesores. Three a long time in the past we famous that “some are informative. Just a few are amusing. However all of them are ugly.”

Additionally they distract drivers, contribute to mild air pollution, and too typically promote unhealthy merchandise.

Cities needs to be taking down billboards, not erecting new ones.

The San Jose Metropolis Council banned the development of recent billboards on public land in 1972 and citywide in 1985 in an motion that was referred to as a “very sturdy dedication on the a part of the Metropolis Council to beautify town.”

It’s a coverage that's nonetheless supported by 93% of San Jose residents, in keeping with a current survey by metropolis employees.

But in 2018, the Metropolis Council voted to permit as much as 22 new digital indicators and billboards on 17 city-owned websites. They might be positioned on city-owned downtown buildings, parking garages and eight freeway-facing public properties, together with some on the airport.

Council members on Tuesday will contemplate a proposal to construct two new digital billboards — every measuring 1,000 sq. ft — alongside Freeway 101 on Mineta San Jose Worldwide Airport property. In trade, media firm Clear Channel is providing to take away eight conventional billboards, pay the airport a minimal of $600,000 a 12 months and let the airport use 10% of the promoting time on the billboards to advertise the airport.

The Metropolis Council ought to comply with the lead of the Airport Fee and reject the proposal. The council also needs to make it clear that it values town’s scenic landscapes over the promoting dollars every other billboards may present. Council members erred in 2018 once they failed to hunt resident enter earlier than their 9-2 vote, as an alternative listening to billboard business executives, lobbyists and a consultant from Lick Observatory, who opposed the plan due to the potential for added mild air pollution.

Billboards are an $8.5 billion business that pours thousands and thousands into lobbying towards restrictions.

All instructed, an estimated 10,000 digital billboards have been constructed throughout the USA.

The Los Angeles Occasions reported that Clear Channel has greater than 500,000 print and digital billboards worldwide, together with billboards able to monitoring folks’s actions and passing the data alongside to advertisers.

Clear Channel “gathers location and monitoring info from a number of sources — apps, information corporations — after which analyzes the information for insights about how folks behave after passing a Clear Channel billboard.”

In the meantime, 4 states have banned billboards altogether. It shouldn’t come as a shock that the 4 states — Alaska, Hawaii, Vermont and Maine — are famend for his or her pure magnificence and as locations to loosen up and revel in nature. Maybe it’s as a result of no billboards exist to distract residents and vacationers.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post