Because the World Anti-Doping Company’s deputy common, Rob Koehler was one in every of a gaggle of impartial observers of the drug testing operation on the 2014 Olympic Video games in Sochi.
Regardless of the presence of the likes of Koehler, an 18-year WADA veteran, Russian sports activities and doping officers with the assistance of the Federal Safety Companies (FSB), the successor to the Soviet period KGB, have been nonetheless in a position to function an elaborate and clandestine operation on the Sochi testing lab that enabled Russian athletes to dope with out getting detected by a post-competition testing system for all medal winners on the 2014 Video games.
A 2016 investigation commissioned by WADA discovered that each one 120 urine samples it examined from Russian athletes on the 2014 Olympics had been tampered with on the Sochi lab.
With the 2022 Olympics Video games set to open Friday in Beijing, Koehler is amongst a rising variety of athletes rights advocates, athletes, coaches and worldwide sports activities officers who've comparable considerations in regards to the potential manipulation of COVID-19 exams by Chinese language authorities.
“Who’s to say it’s going to be any completely different than Sochi?” mentioned Koehler, now director common of International Athlete, a Montreal-based worldwide athlete rights advocacy group funded by Truthful Sport, a non-profit based to encourage and help whistleblowers in sports activities.
“We've got considerations with the safety of the testing, the oversight, the independence and the potential manipulation,” Koehler continued. “I imply in a closed society and a closed nation how are you going to belief all the things goes to be above board?”

Koehler isn’t alone in seeing potential parallels between Sochi and Beijing.
“A comparability between doping and COVID-19 exams is completely so as,” Michael Hoelz, president of the German snowboard federation, mentioned on a podcast final week.
Whereas Dr. Brian McCloskey, chairman of the IOC’s Beijing 2022 Medical Knowledgeable Panel, tried to ease considerations about COVID testing manipulation, his admission that the testing system was “all run by the (Beijing) laboratory and managed by the Beijing authorities” throughout a latest briefing has not restored confidence amongst many athletes, coaches and others that Chinese language officers might tamper with exams to cowl up constructive readings for Chinese language athletes or manipulate the outcomes for overseas athletes who pose a possible menace to the medal hopes of host nation stars.
“I one-hundred p.c agree and it’s completely believable” that Chinese language authorities might manipulate COVID exams, mentioned a distinguished U.S. Olympian, who requested to not be recognized due to a worry of being a goal for retribution by Chinese language and IOC officers. “I went into these Olympics realizing there was going to be (expletive).”
McCloskey’s statements additionally additional uncovered the Worldwide Olympic Committee’s failure to implement extra management and oversight over the COVID testing program and didn't deal with considerations in regards to the evaluate panels’ responsiveness to constructive exams throughout the Video games, critics mentioned.
McCloskey, Koehler mentioned “didn't deal with the elephant within the room that there could possibly be potential manipulation. There’s no impartial oversight. I believe it’s quick sighted and it exhibits that the IOC actually hasn’t thought this by way of and it’s not remoted to China. We talked about it main into Tokyo. It’s an easy factor to control by reporting positives which are negatives. So perhaps the Chinese language get adverse and the U.S. will get constructive.
“So it doesn’t construct plenty of confidence.”
A Beijing 2022 organizing committee official dismissed considerations about tampering with the COVID-19 testing system.
“I would like all athletes and stakeholders to really feel assured. There isn't any want to actually query the credibility of our methods,” mentioned Huang Chun, deputy director common of Beijing 2022’s pandemic prevention and management workplace.
The questioning, nonetheless, continues.
“I doubt that we are going to see truthful play within the competitions in China,” Hoelz mentioned throughout a Snowboarding Germany podcast. Hoelz, like Koehler, has a background in drug testing, working because the chairperson of the German anti-doping company’s supervisory board.
“It's comparatively straightforward with (COVID-19) testing,” Hoelz mentioned. “Somebody can later say, ‘We’re sorry, it was a false constructive.’”
Simply entering into Beijing with out a constructive COVID check dashing years of preparations has been a significant concern for athletes particularly with the outbreak of the extra contagious omicron variant late final yr.
“Everyone is freaked out” about testing constructive for COVID-19, mentioned U.S. skeleton athlete Katie Uhlaender, who will likely be competing in her fifth Olympics in Beijing. “Everyone is actually scared.”
Testing and different COVID-19 protocols that prohibit athletes, coaches, officers and media to a closed-loop or bubble remoted away from the Chinese language public 24/7 earlier than and throughout the Video games are outlined in what the IOC and Beijing 2022 officers name Playbooks.
All athletes have been required to obtain their vaccine and different medical historical past onto a cellphone app referred to as “My2022.” Athletes should additionally obtain day by day well being updates on the app equivalent to temperature and potential COVID signs starting 14 days earlier than their departure to Beijing. Athletes, coaches and officers are required to take a PCR check inside a 96-hour window of their departure for China and one other PCR check 72 hours earlier than take-off. The exams need to be at the least 24 hours aside from one another. Athletes are examined once more upon arrival on the Beijing airport the place customs employees will take an oropharyngeal (throat) and a nasopharyngeal (nostril) swab pattern, which will likely be mixed for evaluation.
“I’m simply going to do my half to be as protected as I can,” mentioned Nathan Chen, the three-time World determine skating champion. “I’ve been triple vaccinated. I’m going to put on my masks in all places I can. We all know the state of affairs goes to be altering. So I don't know what’s going to prove however proper now my focus continues to be simply on getting ready myself as finest I can and attempting to maintain myself protected inside my very own bubble.”
Chen has even skilled in latest weeks sporting a masks.
U.S. freestyle skier Winter Vinecki was remoted in Park Metropolis, Utah, with Olympic teammates and employees for 3 weeks main as much as their departure for Beijing final week.
“Proper now we’ve been just about below the quarantine isolation,” Vinecki mentioned. “It’s fairly strict proper now. We've got separate housing. We've got three completely different homes for our workforce so it’s sort of mixing up the fellows and women and employees so if one thing occurs it doesn’t wipe out the entire workforce.”
The home Vinecki was quarantining in was simply 200 meters from her own residence the place her mom and brothers are at the moment staying.
“I can wave by way of a window and that’s about it,” Vinecki mentioned.
Dr. Daybreak Estelle, Vinecki’s mom, typically cooked for her daughter and her housemates.
“When she’s making us dinner, I am going as much as the entrance door with my masks on,” Vinecki mentioned. “She arms me the dinners, I say whats up and again to the home I am going.”
As soon as in Beijing, athletes will likely be examined day by day. Athletes testing constructive won't be able to compete. Optimistic exams may be appealed to a medical professional panel chaired by McCloskey and composed of 20 members, a mixture of Chinese language and worldwide virologists, public well being and infectious illness consultants.
The testing although is strictly managed by the Chinese language.
“The testing is finished by a neighborhood Beijing workforce, native medical workforce and so they’re processed inside a Chinse laboratory,” McCloskey mentioned. “However all of them work to agreed worldwide requirements and the monitoring system that permits them to verify the fitting outcomes come again to the fitting particular person are the identical sort of methods we use on a regular basis for various medical exams for hospitals all world wide.”
However many athletes, coaches and officers stay skeptical.
“Sure, the IOC has a fee set as much as handle and take care of any instances that would come up and perhaps athletes desire a second opinion, however what’s the timeliness of that given there’s not a lot flexibility given the competitors schedule?” Koehler mentioned. “They’re involved the way it’s going to occur and what’s going to be the top consequence ought to they check constructive. As a result of, once more, the Playbook continues to vary and that is the difficulty we at all times have: issues are being modified by a unilateral determination with out engagement of the stakeholders which is the athletes when it comes to altering protocols. So it's being dictative and as a substitute of collaborative.”
Koehler was requested if he had any response from the IOC to considerations about potential tampering with the COVID testing?
“Nothing,” he mentioned.
With out IOC oversight, Wolfgang Maier, a director with the German ski federation, mentioned the Olympic COVID-19 testing program is being managed “arbitrarily” by Chinese language authorities.
“I perceive the priority and I might be involved,” the U.S. athlete mentioned. “I'm involved.”
“Given the closed system in China, the shortage of transparency, how can’t you be?” added Koehler.
The U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee and nationwide Olympic committees have to be particularly vigilant on the subject of the Beijing COVID testing program, the U.S. Olympian mentioned.
“So if somebody exams constructive it’s going to be extremely dependent for the USOPC or the NOCs to guard their athlete.”
Was the athlete assured that help can be offered?
“No,” the athlete mentioned. “In no way.”